Like thieves there's no honour amongst mutineers which history like this film should judge as being in the wrong THE BOUNTY is a beautiful film experience. The film doesn't go into great detail about the fate of the mutineers but it insinuates that they eventually ended up murdering one another on Pitcairn leaving just one survivor. It's also interesting to note that Bligh had a trio of deserters flogged rather than hanged, an act of compassion that contributes to his downfall. On British naval ships at the time the Captain's word was the word of god but unlike the British army at the time where more often than not officers bought their rank the Royal Navy was a meritocracy where Captain's started at the very bottom of the ladder and worked their way up, bumbling fools didn't get very far in this service. Captain Bligh might have been an authoritarian but there's no way he could in the context of the time be described as a cruel tyrant.

What I loved about this version is that it's very much accurate where the known facts are concerned. Since so many people have seen some tyrant being cruel to the noble Errol Flynn, Clark Gable or Marlon Brando it enters their mind that it must be somehow true. Modern perception of historical events is full of factual mistakes that can be laid firmly at the door of Hollywood The mutiny on The Bounty is another example of Hollywood revisionist history. The defeat of that unit was anything but glorious for the regiment who put up a very poor fight while there's no evidence that Custer died as the last man standing.

The Battle Of Little Big Horn is perceived to have been a glorious defeat for the 7th Calvary and where George A Custer was the last soldier to die. It's strange how Hollywood is responsible for so much bad history being foisted upon the common knowledge of humanity.

Tropical cuties dely nude